III. ECFA目前已成為兩岸特殊關係的新架構，但是缺乏考量以下三點 ：ECFA is now the main agenda for the sensitive relationship between Taiwan and China, but it lacks careful consideration in three areas:

 

1. 法制上的合理建構與程序。2. 經濟上的利弊與風險，勞動就業與社會文化衝擊影響評估。3. 國家安全問題。

1) A reasonable structure and procedure in rule by law. 2) Assessment on economic pros, cons and potential risks, labor employment issues, and impact on society and culture. 3) National security issues

ECFA 規避國與國問題，未回報 WTO 而引起國際抱怨；就國民黨的邏輯，服貿(Service Trade Agreement)→ 2015 年後加入 RECP。政府的分析為在通過 ECFA 的基礎上，擁有中國的支持，台灣可加入 RCEP，因此當前政府為了可以盡早加入 RCEP，加速服貿的推動簽訂，但事實上條文內並無保證。如何得到這樣的保證呢?

The evasion of cross-strait relations in ECFA was not reported back to the WTO and has since triggered international criticism:

The ruling Kuomintang’s judgment is that the Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement  Taiwan joins RCEP after 2015.

According to the government, with the prerequisite of passing ECFA and thus gaining support from China, Taiwan will be able to join the RCEP, therefore to ensure that ECFA comes through as fast as possible, it sees the passing of the Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement as a pressing matter. However, the specifics of the agreement do not guarantee as such. So how can we be sure?